1. I will take a look at the argumentative strategies of the media when it comes to global warming and how they argue either side and potentially find fallacies.
2. I will take a look at statisics and facts presented by global warming arguers and critique them on their relevence and importance to the overall argument of global warming.
3. I will take a look at the spin-off argument on people's ideas about a solution to global warming and how that issue is discussed through the media.
3 comments:
Your arguements are unclear. Im not really sure where you want to go with your paper. I think that you could probably create one thesis statement to include all three of the points.
I don't really think that these can be considered thesis statements. All three of them are too broad and don't encompass enough information. I think you should do as smile3 said and include all three points into one thesis otherwise I don't know how you are going to write ten pages.
I dont think your suposed to use 'I' in a thesis paper. All three are unclear to me about how you intend to use them. They all seem to be more focused on just showing facts rather than producing an arguement. Nothing really debatable is present.
Post a Comment